Students Copying Online Content


Literature students that copy book reviews from the internet short change themselves because professors are aware of it.

How? They see the same book review injected with Botox here and there, from 20 other assignments. College teaching staff, who silently admit that the internet diminished their value long before COVID-19, turn a blind eye and grade copied book reviews with tepid marks, 50-53%. Life is too short to try and fight the tiger: the internet.

However, they reward literature students that read books and write their own analysis handsomely. Professors enjoy reading original student assignments because no two students are the same, even twins, the wonder of nature.

Students that make time to read the book come up with original answers to who, what, why, when and where. They are not yes men and yes women.

The author is not available to explain why the woman in the story has a whole walk-in closet full of white clothes. Students from India might bring a unique insight to the analysis, by saying the colour white is for mourning in their country.

There is no right or wrong in book reviews or any piece of written work for that matter. It is subjective, personal. Students must justify their analysis.

It is good practice for this thing called life. Somewhere down the line, they will sell themselves as politicians, business people, parents or lawyers. Whatever they do in future, hinges on their ability to analyze present circumstances to their advantage.

By: Nonqaba waka Msimang.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elections And Political Bullies

Comfort Food As Regret Food

Einstein Passengers