This Is Not CNN
The White House or the U.S. President is not the only brick
in news coverage, but is definitely its brick and mortar. Therefore, the sitting president’s calibre can
determine the number of viewers that tune in to CNN, and news channels in
general.
The voracious use of Twitter obviously has a negative impact
on television ratings because it is faster than news bulletins and CNN’s six figure
analysis panels, an attempt at rainbow opinion presentation.
The president said or did something. Is it credible? Is it not? Five or six people at the anchor’s
desk give their analysis. Such panel discussions
can be redundant, bearing in mind that Twitter already has 2,000 comments since
the story broke 30 minutes ago.
Television is synonymous with numbers. Shows are taken off the air if they don’t garner
impressive numbers. What is missing from
ratings is the public’s attitude to the sitting president. Are more people watching news channels because
of the president or are there less viewers?
If numbers are diminishing, what is the reason? Do they feel he has nothing new to say? Does his choice of words offend them? Is he contradictory? Do they like the humorous angle of White
House news served by talk show hosts like Trevor Noah or Paul Mecurio? Does his spouse contribute to increasing or falling
viewership?
Social media has changed the rules of the game. Ratings should also. They can no longer be packed in tidy boxes
like age, gender and race. Sitting
presidents positively or negatively affect the number of news consumers, and
there must be some strategy of monitoring that.
By: Nonqaba waka Msimang.
Comments